Friday, 19 February 2016

Video feedback


Titles and studio logo are effective and they link well with print products showing an understanding of the medium of the short film and the institutional context.  There is an implicit awareness of how new media and social media has helped the short film gain a new audience. 

Excellent use of locations and actors including adults.  Excellent technical skill in audio and editing. Use of transitions are selective and appropriate. 

A  full range of shots are employed showing a full understanding of film language. 
The narrative is clear and thought has gone into the concept. Clearly evidenced in the web-log and details of the creative journey.

The script shows the mature and disciplined approach taken by the group. Software was explored and ‘writer duet’ was used so collaboration online was enabled.  There is lots of dialogue which is ambitious and usually is a weak point in student film. However, here it is a strength as boom mics have been used and audio has been mixed in post production. 

Two point lighting was used for interior shots and diffusers were used outside to control natural light. 

Flashback shots allow a sense of the interior conflicts within the protagonists mind. 

End credits show the amount of collaboration and organisation of actors and crew.

The short film demonstrates excellent technical skill and is creative and imaginative.37/40

Saturday, 6 February 2016

'Choice' - Evaluation - Question 1

In what ways does your media product use, develop and challenge forms of codes and conventions of real media texts?



Friday, 5 February 2016

'Choice' - Evaluation - Question 2

"How Effective is the Combination of your Main Product and Ancillary Texts?"





Thursday, 4 February 2016

'Choice' - Evaluation - Question 3

What have you learnt from your audience feedback?

Production
When we was first proposing the idea of this film to the class we got audience feedback though doing a pitch that meant we could change some of the ideas that we had to go in line with what people told us.

We then got audience feedback after we had done our first cut. This meant that we could adapted what we had already got to make the narrative clearer because this was something we had battled with from the start was to let people know the narrative but not give it all away.

After the feedback we got about the narrative being hard to follow we decided to add an In Media Res at the start of the short film. We trailed this to a test audience and the feedback that we got was good from it and people thought that by adding this in the narrative was easier to understand.

We had been getting feedback all the way through the creative process of making ‘choice’. This was something that we really needed because there was some moments that we didn’t know what to do and the audience feedback helped us make some creative decisions that we had in the film.

The Audience feedback when the film was finished was mostly good, as most people liked the camera work and editing and the story line of the film. We did get some negative feedback however. This was due to the fact that some people didn’t get the story line and thought it wasn’t clear but after I had explained what the story line was and how we went about it in the film to not make it too obvious. The people that thought it wasn’t clear then got it and how we did it and they liked the film.

From all the audience feedback we got it shaped the way that the film was made and the creative aspects of the film. This was due to the fact that some of the time we had been unrealistic when it came to things we could and couldn’t do. Through the audience feedback this helped us narrow down different things we had previously done to create the final product.

Film Poster
For the film poster we had made a 4 different first drafts of posters. We then showed an audience for feedback on to what one they through was best. The audience picked a design that they though would look the best and we used that and built on it.

We then made a second draft which has some screenshots that we took from the production and built a poster around that. We then ask an audience to have a look at this draft to see what they thought of it and what we needed to improve on. They thought that the pictures wasn’t good enough quality because they were screenshots. But they thought the lay out of the poster was good.

For the final draft we took on all of the feedback that we had got in the previous 2 drafts and we created a poster that combined the layout of the product that the test audience picked from the first draft and the pictures from the second draft. We took our own pictures instead of using a screenshot, this came together to make a good final draft that we got feedback on and the audience though it was a good film poster that looked like a real film poster. We also got some feedback and it said that it is anchorage for the short film as well because there is a similar composed shot in the film.

Magazine article
We did a similar thing with the magazine article as we did with the Film Poster. For the first draft we made 4 different designs that we thought best suited the magazine article, and we showed these to a test audience. The audience then gave us feedback on what they thought was the best design to go with and we went with that one.

For the second draft we made, we used the layout that the audience picked from the first draft and we started adding our own pictures and information. After we had done this we took it to a different target audience to get more feedback. The feedback we got from this test audience was mostly good but with a few alterations with the grammar and spelling of some of the sentences and some of the pictures were asked to be improved.

For the third and final draft of the magazine article we took our second draft and made a few corrections to the grammar and the pictures we changed as well. This was the final change that we had to make to the magazine article. All of the information was in the article and our audience thought that it looked like a proper magazine article that you would see in a magazine.

To conclude, we have had and used a lot of audience feedback throughout the creative journey of our media production. We had it in the pre-production, the post-production stages and for our print artifacts. We took on board what people thought we adapted to suit what the audience thought.

Tuesday, 19 January 2016

'Choice' - Final Production and Print artefacts

Final Production and Print Artifacts

Final Production


This is the finished draft of the short film 'Choice'. 'Choice' is about a young person called Eric who has to make a very difficult decision  to stay with his mother who never loved him, or to go with his abusive farther that did love him.

Print Artifact

Film Poster


This is the film poster that we had made for our final product. This has anchorage to the main production as the same shot appears in the main production.

Film Review


This is the magazine print artifact and this has been made in the style of Empire Magazine.

Friday, 27 November 2015

'Choice' - First Draft Feedback



My views on the first draft so far; 
  • There is some out of focus shots that we are using in the first draft,
  • Some of the shots aren't very stable such as the tracking shot,
  • The audio in the scenes isn't very good at the minute,
  • Need to finish the editing to make sure that the video flows from one shot to another,
  • The dialogue audio is good and clear,
  • There is props and lights in the background
My questions;
  1. How would you rate the quality of the shots?
  2. What did you enjoy about the video?
  3. What needs improving?
  4. Can you see the pieces of the narrative?
  5. Were the locations varying enough?
  6. how was the acting?
  7. From what you have heard, What did you think of the dialogue?
  8. Can you see the David Fincher Conventions? Are the Obvious?
  9. What part of the editing did you like? Why?
  10. What level would you give it and why?